WSIB a Fraudulent Agency?
I thought I was done with the fighting, the jumping through hoops, and the threats. But now I am faced with an even greater problem. It has been some time since I posted anything about my private life here on this blog, and though I am apprehensive about sharing more I’m going to do it anyways. Perhaps there are other people going through the same thing, and maybe somewhere there is someone that can help.
On October 2nd I posted a story about what was going on in my life at the time with WSIB, and you can see that here. It will give you a little background information leading up to what is happening now.
My medication has been changed numerous times since then, including OXY CONTIN, CODEINE CONTIN, AMYTRIPTILINE, DEMEROL, And LYRICA. Now I am strictly on Morphine, one is a slow release the other a stronger dose for breakthrough pain. Aside from the inherent drowsiness and loss of motor skills that come with this medication there is also the side effects, like constipation and severe cramps. Without going in to too much detail it is not very pleasant. At this level of medication I am still not pain free but it is at a “tolerable” level as long as I am not too active.
Right now my abilities, and my Doctors assessment of my condition concur, I can not sit for more than 10-15 minutes at a time. I can not walk very far or for very long. I cannot do any bending and turning at the same time. My weight restrictions on lifting is not much more than 15 pounds. My ability to concentrate for long periods of time is diminished, and I get “spaced out” at random intervals.
WSIB, knowing this and having seen my Doctors report, is forcing me to enter a 4 week re training program aimed at returning me to work or lose my entitlement to benefits. And though I am told I may appeal this action, before that process is complete I must comply with their decision. Which means that they are forcing me to do something against my Doctors orders, something I am not physically capable of doing in order to continue receiving benefits.
I will concede that there are many cases of fraud that this agency must deal with. But in this case the medical file on record in this case is stacked high and I have piles of medical documentation, tests, and reports to back up what I have said. Yet, they still maintain their position that I am fit for work and all I need is a 4 week course to get trained in a new job and all will be right in their world.
This is our Government at work.
Suggestions?
131 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
It’s like an episode of Hogan’s Heroes “and the commandant is sleeping.”
You (any injured worker) should be paid from the date of an accident (Loss of Earnings Benefit and much more) but WSiB routinely defrauds desperate IW from back/ retroactive pay by psychologically working sick/injured workers with promises, that if YOU wave back pay, then they will start to pay “benefit” in no time with out EXCESSIVE scrutiny / investigation!
AND MANY INJURED WORKERS DO GO FOR SUCH SCUM BECOUSE THEY ARE SO EXAUSTED / SICK/TORMENTED THAT THIS IS THE ONLY WAY OUT OF TORTURE AND TO STAY ALIFE!!!!!
MANY INJURED WORKERS DO NOT SURVIWE YEARS OF PROCESSING /OBUSE/TORTURE BY WSiB/WCB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WSiB KILLS INJURED WORKERS!
SICK / INJURED WORKERS NEED HELP RIGHT AWAY, NOT AFTER YEARS OF OBUSE/ TORTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS IS LIKE SOME ONE CALS 911 FOR HELP AND HELP COMES YEARS AFTER EMERGENCE CALL!!!!!!!!
WSiB and WCB ARE TERROR AGENCIES PROTECTED BY CRIMINAL IMMUNITY AND COOPERATION FROM OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. THIS IS HAPPENING IN CANADA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SCUM / CRIME ALL THE WAY!!!!
LikeLike
Comment by Andrew | March 14, 2011, 11:37 AM
Andrew said:
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
March14/2011
Dear Sir/Madam,
Please PREVENT Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) on Criminal Grounds of Inadmissibility / committing acts which constitute the essential elements of a crime involving moral turpitude ( FROUD, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND MANY MORE) , from participation in adjudicative process. An attempt or conspiracy to commit such a crime is included in this ground. They committed/ committing acts which constitute the essential elements of a violation or conspiracy to violate many laws / regulations in Canada.
The convictions arose not from a single trial or arose from a single scheme of conduct involving moral turpitude but from years long PATERN OF BEHAVIOUR. (Evidence).
Those individuals engaged in criminal activities on behalf of Criminal Corporation (Apotex) FOR MANY YEARS AND THEY MUST BE STOPED!
I know /have reason to believe that those individuals are known assisters, abettors, conspirators, colluders with others in the illicit acts to torture, discriminate, deny medical help to me / a disabled person.
It is submitted , that Apotex / Counsel, Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) as well as Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) should be prevented from abuse and obstruction of ALL adjudicative processes and from making any frivolous, vexatious , trivial , made in bad faith suggestions with out any merit / scientific / legal bases further tormenting/ torturing me /a victim. Thos individuals should be charged with Contempt of all Administrative Boards, Commissions, Tribunals processes etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) falsified all records provided by them to all Government Agencies and engaged others / employees in criminal conspiracy (documented) which untimely further deteriorated(s) my state of health.
Those individuals purposely are omitting very critical evidence and medical conditions (or are reducing it in to insignificance).
For many years those individuals were committing crimes against me / a victim by falsifying/ concealing evidence / Documents, soliciting criminal witnesses etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) got engaged in intentional malicious conduct on behalf of Criminal Corporation violating all statutes with a reckless indifference. They acted in the face of a perceived risk that their actions will violate all laws, torture and destroy / kill suffering, sick person.
They perpetuated TORTURE, TORMENT, RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION and HERRASMENT etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson, (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos did knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies, in the process DENIED MEDICAL HELP as well as obstructed Canadian Constitution, Legal System etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did contribute to my permanent disability, irreparable damage. Issues and/or events which occurred after my departure from Employer are also in full are Apotex’s (Mr. Peterson’s -Company’s Counsel and Ms. Koos as accomplices /executors ) liabilities due to fact that those individuals on behalf of Apotex actively sabotaged legal /administrative proceedings in all Government Agencies in question. Preliminary matters are that Mr. Peterson (Company’s Counsel) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) in premeditated manner are torturing me for MANY, MANY years and pending. They / Company /accomplices act without any consideration for the human rights and my well being despite their awareness of my situation and familiarity with my File.
Apotex is defiant, not regretful, with out remorse, not willing to correct wrong doings.
Mr. Carl Peterson,(Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) falsified or concealed all records provided by them to Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies (collectively Government) and engaged other people in criminal conspiracy (documented) which untimely further deteriorates my state of health. On behalf of Company they committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did contribute to permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Those individuals got involved in my Case, purposely were omitting /altering very critical evidence and medical conditions (or were reducing it in to insignificance) and were paid for it while limiting my professional and personal life, making challenging my social life, destroyed my marriage, imposed extreme hardship on my family and relatives/friends and in vicious / malicious manner on on going bases are preventing me from enjoying my Constitutional Right to obtain medical help, be able to provide for myself etc.
In near future I may select to proceed with CIVIL/ CRIMINAL/ LEGAL ACTIOMN AGAINST Mr. Carl Peterson , his Firm (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex).
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP):
*Despite his OATH TO HER MAJESTY “JUSTICE” TO SERVE LOYALLY, JUSTIFETLY THOSE IN NEED /JUSTICE SYSTEM, unfortunately he selected to utilize his knowledge / expertise in criminal, amoral, unprincipled manner. He explored /utilized gross deficiencies of the Regulatory System and acted against very sick /disadvantaged / UNREPRESENTED ex-employee of criminal Corporation contributing great deal to my suffer and to my misery for many, many years.
* Mr. Carl Peterson WITH OUT HASITATION COLLECTED HIS HIGH SALLARY, WHILE FOR YEARS DESTROYING SICK / SUFFERING PERSON NOT ABLE TO AFORD MEDICATION , GROCERIES AND ANY THING ELSE AND SPENDING YEARS BEING BEDRIDDEN IN EXCRUCIATING PAIN.
*He could not restrain his bad impulses.
*He prevented me from access to Lawyers, to the legal system, to justice!
*Mr. Carl Peterson did every thing in his capacity to make me unsuccessful in my drive for help and justice despite his awareness of my medical conditions / personal situation and the evidence conforming my allegations.
*Mr. Carl Peterson directly disrespected me twice in the period of my struggle while during Mediation process in Labour Board he abandoned the proceedings and left the Conference Room with out saying any thing (out of the blue he got up and left the proceedings).
*The same behaviour he demonstrated second time around during Mediation at Human Rights Commission living Room with out saying a world (out of the blue he got up and left the proceedings).
*Mr. Carl Peterson wants to participate in judicial process conducted by WSIAT but he is not in position to make any decisions nor he has any authorisations to act on behalf of the Company to mediate any thing ( he did not forward any documents supporting his powers accept Participation Authorisation). The same situation was every were else.
*Appears, that Mr. Carl Peterson wants yet again to derail this time around WSIAT’S PROCES.
*This is fundamentally undemocratic and not acceptable!
Legal profession changed very negatively in Canada.
It becomes a business interested in making profit not making judgments based on merits.
*Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) becomes enabler for Apotex! He manipulated system/ Government Agencies in order to torture, torment, deny of all civil/ constitutional rights, medical help to a disabled person etc.
*“EVERY LAWYER IS GOING TO GO IN TO THE OFFICE TODAY AND COMMIT FROUD”- A TOP LEGAL SCHOLAR AND EX-BAY STREET LAWYER PHILIP SLAYTON TALKS ABOUT HOW LAWYERS BECOME GREADY, UNPRINCIPLED ENABLERS OF THE RICH – THE CORRUPTION OF THIS PROFESSION . “LAWYERS ARE RATS!”
Ms. K. Koos (Apotex):
• Despite numerous letters from WSiB demanding Safety Data from Employer, Ms. K. Koos for many months stagnated process claiming, that SHE MUST PREPARE /fabricate THEM (SHE DID SORTE OUT WHAT WAS IN SUPPORT OF MY CLAIM) and provided selective / bias info.
• Ms. K. Koos obtain “list of products” that I was exposed to (?) from dysfunctional employee who during his employment created an accident at work place and he become a victim of it. Later on he becomes Apotex’s “safety” rep. and a criminally motivated “witness”.
• She miss represented herself claiming , that she did on regular bases meet with me to discuss safety issues and to do some safety quizzes while the truth are that she started her employment with Apotex 3 (three) years after I was criminally terminated.
• Ms. K. Koos Provided number of quizzes to WSiB , which she claimed that I did complete during employment , while in fact all of them were completed by me in one / first day of my employment in 1997.
• Ms. K. Koos altered my personal / Company’s medical records withholding / canceling all Records indicating my medical problems during my employment
• Ms. K. Koos cancels Company’s Record indicating , that I was perfectly healthy before my employment with Apotex
• She removed Company’s Records generated by Health and Safety Clinic recording fact that I never was issued any mask / protective equipment,
• She counseled record, that Company was under construction during my 6,5 years of employment and all equipment / systems were invalidated/ not functional and buildings were substantially demolished with piles of debris constantly present in Manufacturing /Packaging areas during processes.
• She concealed fact that during my employment Company did not have a Nurse on the stuff NOR OFFICIALY ORGANIZED SAFETY DEPARTMENT.
• Ms. K. Koos CONSEALED FACT , THAT VERY MANY EMPLOYEES SUFERRED DEADLY MEDICAL PROBLEMS AS RESULT OF / FROM UNPROTECTED EXPOSURES TO VERY POTENT ACTIVES
• She did not disclose that most Apotex’s employees from my period of employment were temporary and are not employed any more.
• She did not admit as Company’s Record show, that I worked with out any management, with out any in process quality control, on night shifts and that all my allegations are cross referenced by evidence.
• Etc., etc., etc.
Please include into my File additional medical condition MALICIOUSLY and in BAD FAITH, by means of fraud, deception , intentional deceit, perfidy omitted by all involved in my Case including Apotex’s Counsel Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP -who argues a legal position that he knows to be false – a Counsel who uses language and criminally twisted reasoning/ methodology which are deliberately misleading in order to deny my claim. Counsel, who is not willing /able to sincerely endorse the principles of justice), most Doctors, a CRIMINAL WSiB and all Government Agencies involved in my Case.
In law, there are inconsistent definitions of bad faith, with one definition much more broad than used in other fields. Black’s Law Dictionary equates fraud with bad faith. But one goes to jail for fraud, and not necessarily for bad faith. The Duhaime online law dictionary similarly defines bad faith broadly as “intent to deceive”, and “a person who intentionally tries to deceive or mislead another in order to gain some advantage”. A Canadian labor arbitrator wrote, in one case, that bad faith is related to rationality in reasoning, as it is used in other fields, but is ill defined in the law.
The concept of bad faith is likely not capable of precise calibration and certainly has not been defined in the same way by all adjudicators. At its core, bad faith implies malice or ill will. A decision made in bad faith is grounded, not on a rational connection between the circumstances and the outcome, but on antipathy toward the individual for non-rational reasons… The absence of a rational basis for the decision implies that factors other than those relevant were considered. In that sense, a decision in bad faith is also arbitrary. These comments are not intended to put to rest the debate over the definition of bad faith. Rather, it is to point out that bad faith, which has its core in malice and ill will, at least touches, if not wholly embraces, the related concepts of unreasonableness, discrimination and arbitrariness.
What was called “Canada’s best judicial definition of ‘bad faith'” by Duhaime’s Legal Dictionary is similarly more consistent with use in other fields.
Good faith and its opposite, bad faith, imports a subjective state of mind, the former motivated by honesty of purpose and the latter by ill-will.
Duhaime also refers to another description, “…bad faith refers to a subjective state of mind… motivated by ill will … or even sinister purposes.”
Punitive and exemplary damages
Courts can award punitive or exemplary damages, over and above the claim, against any Corporation / individual or/and insurance company which is found to have adjusted a claim in bad faith; the damages may be awarded with the aim of deterring such behavior among insurers in general, and may far exceed the amount of the damage due under the insurance policy. In Canada, one case of this type resulted in a record punitive award of $1 million CAD when an insurance company pressed a claim for arson even after its own experts and adjusters had come to the conclusion that the fire was accidental; the company was advised by legal council that the desperate insured parties would be willing to settle for much less than what they were owed.
IN MY CASE, Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) did knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Labor Board, WSiB (Workers Compensation Insurance Board), Ontario Human Rights Commission /Tribunal, obstructed Ontario Health Act, Ontario Labor Law as well as Canadian Constitution etc.
IN MY CASE, Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did cause /contribute to permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Company and all involved in sabotaging of my allegations must be INDICTED and convicted on multiple offences / crimes (Criminal Code, Constitutional provisions, Bill – 45, Bill 107, Bill – 168 and other Law provisions).
Best Regards,
(Apotex’s victim)
LikeLike
Comment by Andrew | March 18, 2011, 12:08 PM
Comment by Andrew | March 19, 2011, 4:53 PM
Comment by Andrew | March 19, 2011, 4:54 PM
Andrew said:
… this is a chemical holocaust against General Public!! What needs to happen before this reign of medical terror is brought to an end?
March 9, 2011 1:38 PM
Andrew said:
Dear Sir//Madam,
As I did communicate to you before, many of my medical conditions were determined by Doctors / Specialists, but due to Aponte’s criminal influence/ criminal conspiracy most of them were omitted by Doctors, Adjudicators or reduced in to insignificance (so forth left untreated). Please include in my File additional conditions resulting from my very long and unprotected exposure to very toxic molecules during my employment at Apotex which I do suffer from right now.
Please include into my File additional medical condition MALICIOUSLY in BAD FAITH, by means of fraud, deception , intentional deceit, perfidy was omitted by all involved in my Case including Apotex’s Counsel Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP -who argues a legal position that he knows to be false – a Counsel who uses language and criminally twisted reasoning/ methodology which are deliberately misleading in order to deny my claim. Counsel, who is not willing /able to sincerely endorse the principles of justice), most Doctors, a CRIMINAL WSiB and all Government Agencies involved in my Case.
Company criminally concealed names/ nature of processed products. Company processed products with out regulatory permits in Facility not approved for those products (not providing any personal / collective protection for Personnel), did not post Safety Data Shits , Work Orders and did not disclose short and long term health hazards do to massive unprotected exposures. That was done during 6.5 years of very extensive construction / demolition / expansion. I am suffering a great deal with life threatening medical conditions not able to afford groceries, needed medications or to pay any of my financial dues. I am not able to perform any chores around my residence, forced to relay on assistance. I was “swimming in” / a massive exposure with out any protection to a potent immunosuppressant used for organ transplants, brain function controlling drugs (psychiatric), antidepressants , blood pressure / composition controlling drugs, narcotics etc. which overwhelmed my system
Doctors and Government Agencies disregarded my (a Basal-cell carcinoma) which I developed during my employment with Apotex.
In 2003 I developed it on my one leg.
Since that time (7 years of deny of medical and all other help) it showed up on my two legs, arm, neck and a face.
The condition spread / deteriorated during period of 7 years after Apotex’s criminal termination of me a very sick employee as well as due to adversary action by Apotex (and accomplices).
Please, kindly include (amongst my other life threatening medical conditions) discovery of large and very painful a soft-tissue mass (soft-tissue tumors/soft-tissue lumps) on my extremities (arms and a leg). The conditions were discovered by number of Doctors (amongst Dr. Brian Gibson LAMP Occupational Health Centre, Dr. Jakubovic Dermatologist /Specialist in Occupational Health Services (Department of Occupational and Environmental Health in St. Michael’s Hospital)
Unfortunately for diagnosticians, the epidemiological and clinical features of patients presenting with a malignant soft-tissue tumor do not differ substantially from those of patients with a benign soft-tissue tumor. Carcinomas can metastasize to soft tissues and lymphomas can erode.
My disconection with environment / disconnection with emotions. Lately, one of my many medical conditions deteriorated and imposes on me a lot of difficulties and enormous stress.
During my employment I developed lungs problem (due to product side effects- reported to Superiors and documented). My autonomic function of lungs (a function of the respiratory cycles) has been compromised.
More and more frequently I am stopping to breathe with out a warning. These are relatively short in duration episodes but I am not in control of them. Despite my conscious mind I struggle in-vein to take air and I can not make my lungs to move. I suspect that my neurons / neurotransmitters are affected / damaged (altered function / communication) by active ingredients at work.
When I position my eyes to the right or left, without moving my head, I experience extreme vertigo….
Every nerve and cell within me is screaming … and I experience “electrical-jolt” type sensations throughout my entire body…
The nausea I experience everyday is so terrible that I feel as if I could go on throwing up for hours,
My brain feels as if it’s “swimming inside of my skull…
My heart flutters so fast and sporadically, I feel as if at any moment, my heart will explode and I will drop dead with a heart attack. ………
The side effects of these drugs are extremely annoying. (Short term memory loss, insomnia, loss of libido etc) to name a few.
But NOTHING compares to the nightmarish HELL I experience of coming off of all these anti-depressant type drugs, narcotics etc.
I was told that I do have permanent problems!
It has been hell for years with my anxiety, depression, zaps, pain etc.
I feel like I want to die!
Please overcome obstacles preventing you from disclosing those diagnoses.
In law, there are inconsistent definitions of bad faith, with one definition much more broad than used in other fields. Black’s Law Dictionary equates fraud with bad faith. But one goes to jail for fraud, and not necessarily for bad faith. The Duhaime online law dictionary similarly defines bad faith broadly as “intent to deceive”, and “a person who intentionally tries to deceive or mislead another in order to gain some advantage”. A Canadian labor arbitrator wrote, in one case, that bad faith is related to rationality in reasoning, as it is used in other fields, but is ill defined in the law.
The concept of bad faith is likely not capable of precise calibration and certainly has not been defined in the same way by all adjudicators. At its core, bad faith implies malice or ill will. A decision made in bad faith is grounded, not on a rational connection between the circumstances and the outcome, but on antipathy toward the individual for non-rational reasons… The absence of a rational basis for the decision implies that factors other than those relevant were considered. In that sense, a decision in bad faith is also arbitrary. These comments are not intended to put to rest the debate over the definition of bad faith. Rather, it is to point out that bad faith, which has its core in malice and ill will, at least touches, if not wholly embraces, the related concepts of unreasonableness, discrimination and arbitrariness.
What was called “Canada’s best judicial definition of ‘bad faith'” by Duhaime’s Legal Dictionary is similarly more consistent with use in other fields.
Good faith and its opposite, bad faith, imports a subjective state of mind, the former motivated by honesty of purpose and the latter by ill-will.
Duhaime also refers to another description, “…bad faith refers to a subjective state of mind… motivated by ill will … or even sinister purposes.”
Punitive and exemplary damages
Courts can award punitive or exemplary damages, over and above the claim, against any Corporation / individual or/and insurance company which is found to have adjusted a claim in bad faith; the damages may be awarded with the aim of deterring such behavior among insurers in general, and may far exceed the amount of the damage due under the insurance policy. In Canada, one case of this type resulted in a record punitive award of $1 million CAD when an insurance company pressed a claim for arson even after its own experts and adjusters had come to the conclusion that the fire was accidental; the company was advised by legal council that the desperate insured parties would be willing to settle for much less than what they were owed.
IN MY CASE, Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) did knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Labor Board, WSiB (Workers Compensation Insurance Board), Ontario Human Rights Commission /Tribunal, obstructed Ontario Health Act, Ontario Labor Law as well as Canadian Constitution etc.
IN MY CASE, Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did cause /contribute to permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Company and all involved in sabotaging of my allegations must be INDICTED and convicted on multiple offences / crimes (Criminal Code, Constitutional provisions, Bill – 45, Bill 107, Bill – 168 and other Law provisions).
Best Regards,
(Apotex’s victim)
March 13, 2011 1:22 PM
Andrew said:
It’s like an episode of Hogan’s Heroes “and the commandant is sleeping.”
You (any injured worker) should be paid from the date of an accident (Loss of Earnings Benefit and much more) but WSiB routinely defrauds desperate IW from back/ retroactive pay by psychologically working sick/injured workers with promises, that if YOU wave back pay, then they will start to pay “benefit” in no time with out EXCESSIVE scrutiny / investigation!
AND MANY INJURED WORKERS DO GO FOR SUCH SCUM BECOUSE THEY ARE SO EXAUSTED / SICK/TORMENTED THAT THIS IS THE ONLY WAY OUT OF TORTURE AND TO STAY ALIFE!!!!!
MANY INJURED WORKERS DO NOT SURVIWE YEARS OF PROCESSING /OBUSE/TORTURE BY WSiB/WCB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WSiB KILLS INJURED WORKERS!
SICK / INJURED WORKERS NEED HELP RIGHT AWAY, NOT AFTER YEARS OF OBUSE/ TORTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS IS LIKE SOME ONE CALS 911 FOR HELP AND HELP COMES YEARS AFTER EMERGENCE CALL!!!!!!!!
WSiB and WCB ARE TERROR AGENCIES PROTECTED BY CRIMINAL IMMUNITY AND COOPERATION FROM OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. THIS IS HAPPENING IN CANADA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SCUM / CRIME ALL THE WAY!!!!
March 14, 2011 11:33 AM
Andrew said:
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
March14/2011
Dear Sir/Madam,
Please PREVENT Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) on Criminal Grounds of Inadmissibility / committing acts which constitute the essential elements of a crime involving moral turpitude ( FROUD, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND MANY MORE) , from participation in adjudicative process. An attempt or conspiracy to commit such a crime is included in this ground. They committed/ committing acts which constitute the essential elements of a violation or conspiracy to violate many laws / regulations in Canada.
The convictions arose not from a single trial or arose from a single scheme of conduct involving moral turpitude but from years long PATERN OF BEHAVIOUR. (Evidence).
Those individuals engaged in criminal activities on behalf of Criminal Corporation (Apotex) FOR MANY YEARS AND THEY MUST BE STOPED!
I know /have reason to believe that those individuals are known assisters, abettors, conspirators, colluders with others in the illicit acts to torture, discriminate, deny medical help to me / a disabled person.
It is submitted , that Apotex / Counsel, Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) as well as Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) should be prevented from abuse and obstruction of ALL adjudicative processes and from making any frivolous, vexatious , trivial , made in bad faith suggestions with out any merit / scientific / legal bases further tormenting/ torturing me /a victim. Thos individuals should be charged with Contempt of all Administrative Boards, Commissions, Tribunals processes etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) falsified all records provided by them to all Government Agencies and engaged others / employees in criminal conspiracy (documented) which untimely further deteriorated(s) my state of health.
Those individuals purposely are omitting very critical evidence and medical conditions (or are reducing it in to insignificance).
For many years those individuals were committing crimes against me / a victim by falsifying/ concealing evidence / Documents, soliciting criminal witnesses etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) got engaged in intentional malicious conduct on behalf of Criminal Corporation violating all statutes with a reckless indifference. They acted in the face of a perceived risk that their actions will violate all laws, torture and destroy / kill suffering, sick person.
They perpetuated TORTURE, TORMENT, RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION and HERRASMENT etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson, (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos did knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies, in the process DENIED MEDICAL HELP as well as obstructed Canadian Constitution, Legal System etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did contribute to my permanent disability, irreparable damage. Issues and/or events which occurred after my departure from Employer are also in full are Apotex’s (Mr. Peterson’s -Company’s Counsel and Ms. Koos as accomplices /executors ) liabilities due to fact that those individuals on behalf of Apotex actively sabotaged legal /administrative proceedings in all Government Agencies in question. Preliminary matters are that Mr. Peterson (Company’s Counsel) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) in premeditated manner are torturing me for MANY, MANY years and pending. They / Company /accomplices act without any consideration for the human rights and my well being despite their awareness of my situation and familiarity with my File.
Apotex is defiant, not regretful, with out remorse, not willing to correct wrong doings.
Mr. Carl Peterson,(Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex) falsified or concealed all records provided by them to Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other Government Agencies (collectively Government) and engaged other people in criminal conspiracy (documented) which untimely further deteriorates my state of health. On behalf of Company they committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did contribute to permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Those individuals got involved in my Case, purposely were omitting /altering very critical evidence and medical conditions (or were reducing it in to insignificance) and were paid for it while limiting my professional and personal life, making challenging my social life, destroyed my marriage, imposed extreme hardship on my family and relatives/friends and in vicious / malicious manner on on going bases are preventing me from enjoying my Constitutional Right to obtain medical help, be able to provide for myself etc.
In near future I may select to proceed with CIVIL/ CRIMINAL/ LEGAL ACTIOMN AGAINST Mr. Carl Peterson , his Firm (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koos (Apotex).
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP):
*Despite his OATH TO HER MAJESTY “JUSTICE” TO SERVE LOYALLY, JUSTIFETLY THOSE IN NEED /JUSTICE SYSTEM, unfortunately he selected to utilize his knowledge / expertise in criminal, amoral, unprincipled manner. He explored /utilized gross deficiencies of the Regulatory System and acted against very sick /disadvantaged / UNREPRESENTED ex-employee of criminal Corporation contributing great deal to my suffer and to my misery for many, many years.
* Mr. Carl Peterson WITH OUT HASITATION COLLECTED HIS HIGH SALLARY, WHILE FOR YEARS DESTROYING SICK / SUFFERING PERSON NOT ABLE TO AFORD MEDICATION , GROCERIES AND ANY THING ELSE AND SPENDING YEARS BEING BEDRIDDEN IN EXCRUCIATING PAIN.
*He could not restrain his bad impulses.
*He prevented me from access to Lawyers, to the legal system, to justice!
*Mr. Carl Peterson did every thing in his capacity to make me unsuccessful in my drive for help and justice despite his awareness of my medical conditions / personal situation and the evidence conforming my allegations.
*Mr. Carl Peterson directly disrespected me twice in the period of my struggle while during Mediation process in Labour Board he abandoned the proceedings and left the Conference Room with out saying any thing (out of the blue he got up and left the proceedings).
*The same behaviour he demonstrated second time around during Mediation at Human Rights Commission living Room with out saying a world (out of the blue he got up and left the proceedings).
*Mr. Carl Peterson wants to participate in judicial process conducted by WSIAT but he is not in position to make any decisions nor he has any authorisations to act on behalf of the Company to mediate any thing ( he did not forward any documents supporting his powers accept Participation Authorisation). The same situation was every were else.
*Appears, that Mr. Carl Peterson wants yet again to derail this time around WSIAT’S PROCES.
*This is fundamentally undemocratic and not acceptable!
Legal profession changed very negatively in Canada.
It becomes a business interested in making profit not making judgments based on merits.
*Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) becomes enabler for Apotex! He manipulated system/ Government Agencies in order to torture, torment, deny of all civil/ constitutional rights, medical help to a disabled person etc.
*“EVERY LAWYER IS GOING TO GO IN TO THE OFFICE TODAY AND COMMIT FROUD”- A TOP LEGAL SCHOLAR AND EX-BAY STREET LAWYER PHILIP SLAYTON TALKS ABOUT HOW LAWYERS BECOME GREADY, UNPRINCIPLED ENABLERS OF THE RICH – THE CORRUPTION OF THIS PROFESSION . “LAWYERS ARE RATS!”
Ms. K. Koos (Apotex):
• Despite numerous letters from WSiB demanding Safety Data from Employer, Ms. K. Koos for many months stagnated process claiming, that SHE MUST PREPARE /fabricate THEM (SHE DID SORTE OUT WHAT WAS IN SUPPORT OF MY CLAIM) and provided selective / bias info.
• Ms. K. Koos obtain “list of products” that I was exposed to (?) from dysfunctional employee who during his employment created an accident at work place and he become a victim of it. Later on he becomes Apotex’s “safety” rep. and a criminally motivated “witness”.
• She miss represented herself claiming , that she did on regular bases meet with me to discuss safety issues and to do some safety quizzes while the truth are that she started her employment with Apotex 3 (three) years after I was criminally terminated.
• Ms. K. Koos Provided number of quizzes to WSiB , which she claimed that I did complete during employment , while in fact all of them were completed by me in one / first day of my employment in 1997.
• Ms. K. Koos altered my personal / Company’s medical records withholding / canceling all Records indicating my medical problems during my employment
• Ms. K. Koos cancels Company’s Record indicating , that I was perfectly healthy before my employment with Apotex
• She removed Company’s Records generated by Health and Safety Clinic recording fact that I never was issued any mask / protective equipment,
• She counseled record, that Company was under construction during my 6,5 years of employment and all equipment / systems were invalidated/ not functional and buildings were substantially demolished with piles of debris constantly present in Manufacturing /Packaging areas during processes.
• She concealed fact that during my employment Company did not have a Nurse on the stuff NOR OFFICIALY ORGANIZED SAFETY DEPARTMENT.
• Ms. K. Koos CONSEALED FACT , THAT VERY MANY EMPLOYEES SUFERRED DEADLY MEDICAL PROBLEMS AS RESULT OF / FROM UNPROTECTED EXPOSURES TO VERY POTENT ACTIVES
• She did not disclose that most Apotex’s employees from my period of employment were temporary and are not employed any more.
• She did not admit as Company’s Record show, that I worked with out any management, with out any in process quality control, on night shifts and that all my allegations are cross referenced by evidence.
• Etc., etc., etc.
Please include into my File additional medical condition MALICIOUSLY and in BAD FAITH, by means of fraud, deception , intentional deceit, perfidy omitted by all involved in my Case including Apotex’s Counsel Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP -who argues a legal position that he knows to be false – a Counsel who uses language and criminally twisted reasoning/ methodology which are deliberately misleading in order to deny my claim. Counsel, who is not willing /able to sincerely endorse the principles of justice), most Doctors, a CRIMINAL WSiB and all Government Agencies involved in my Case.
In law, there are inconsistent definitions of bad faith, with one definition much more broad than used in other fields. Black’s Law Dictionary equates fraud with bad faith. But one goes to jail for fraud, and not necessarily for bad faith. The Duhaime online law dictionary similarly defines bad faith broadly as “intent to deceive”, and “a person who intentionally tries to deceive or mislead another in order to gain some advantage”. A Canadian labor arbitrator wrote, in one case, that bad faith is related to rationality in reasoning, as it is used in other fields, but is ill defined in the law.
The concept of bad faith is likely not capable of precise calibration and certainly has not been defined in the same way by all adjudicators. At its core, bad faith implies malice or ill will. A decision made in bad faith is grounded, not on a rational connection between the circumstances and the outcome, but on antipathy toward the individual for non-rational reasons… The absence of a rational basis for the decision implies that factors other than those relevant were considered. In that sense, a decision in bad faith is also arbitrary. These comments are not intended to put to rest the debate over the definition of bad faith. Rather, it is to point out that bad faith, which has its core in malice and ill will, at least touches, if not wholly embraces, the related concepts of unreasonableness, discrimination and arbitrariness.
What was called “Canada’s best judicial definition of ‘bad faith'” by Duhaime’s Legal Dictionary is similarly more consistent with use in other fields.
Good faith and its opposite, bad faith, imports a subjective state of mind, the former motivated by honesty of purpose and the latter by ill-will.
Duhaime also refers to another description, “…bad faith refers to a subjective state of mind… motivated by ill will … or even sinister purposes.”
Punitive and exemplary damages
Courts can award punitive or exemplary damages, over and above the claim, against any Corporation / individual or/and insurance company which is found to have adjusted a claim in bad faith; the damages may be awarded with the aim of deterring such behavior among insurers in general, and may far exceed the amount of the damage due under the insurance policy. In Canada, one case of this type resulted in a record punitive award of $1 million CAD when an insurance company pressed a claim for arson even after its own experts and adjusters had come to the conclusion that the fire was accidental; the company was advised by legal council that the desperate insured parties would be willing to settle for much less than what they were owed.
IN MY CASE, Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) did knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Labor Board, WSiB (Workers Compensation Insurance Board), Ontario Human Rights Commission /Tribunal, obstructed Ontario Health Act, Ontario Labor Law as well as Canadian Constitution etc.
IN MY CASE, Mr.Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koos (Apotex) committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did cause /contribute to permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Company and all involved in sabotaging of my allegations must be INDICTED and convicted on multiple offences / crimes (Criminal Code, Constitutional provisions, Bill – 45, Bill 107, Bill – 168 and other Law provisions).
Best Regards,
(Apotex’s victim)
LikeLike
Comment by Andrew | March 19, 2011, 4:55 PM